Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Editorial

A Baffling, Hard-line Choice in Israel

Avigdor Lieberman’s previous stints as Israel’s foreign minister under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu were a disaster for Israeli-American relations. Mr. Lieberman’s ultranationalist positions on Palestinians, settlements and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict rendered him effectively unwelcome in Washington and toxic to Palestinians. Yet to shore up his coalition in the Israeli Parliament, Mr. Netanyahu has now offered Mr. Lieberman the office of minister of defense — widely considered to be the second most powerful position in the Israeli government, with a critical role in dealing with the United States and the Palestinians.

Mr. Netanyahu may think his political needs are more important than relations with the soon-to-end Obama administration, relations that are already severely strained by the nuclear agreement with Iran. But the administration had at least established a working relationship with Moshe Yaalon, the tough but pragmatic defense minister who resigned once the offer to Mr. Lieberman became known. The timing of this changing of the guard is particularly sensitive because a critical 10-year defense agreement establishing new levels of American military aid for Israel is in the final stages of negotiations.

It’s hard to imagine peace talks moving rapidly forward in the immediate future, for a number of reasons. But it is entirely possible to imagine Israel’s relations in the region and beyond moving backward with a defense minister who has threatened, among other things, to conquer Gaza or bomb the Aswan Dam in the event of a war with Egypt. Mr. Lieberman’s ties with Israel’s own military establishment are frayed, most recently by his defense of an Israeli soldier arrested for executing a wounded Palestinian.

Image
Avigdor Lieberman, center, at the Israeli parliament in Jerusalem, on Monday.Credit...Ronen Zvulun/Reuters

Mr. Lieberman’s appointment would make a mockery of any possible Israeli overtures to the Palestinians. He resigned from the government last year over Mr. Netanyahu’s failure to destroy Hamas, the Islamic militant group that controls Gaza, and to build more settlements in Jerusalem and the West Bank, where Mr. Lieberman lives. He has called for removing Arabic as an official language and has proposed instituting the death penalty for convicted terrorists.

Even Mr. Netanyahu does not believe Mr. Lieberman is the right man for the job — or at least he didn’t quite recently, when he declared that “Lieberman hates me, he slanders me, he’s a dangerous man, he stops at nothing.”

But the prime minister seems to think that bringing peace to his shaky coalition, which now holds a scant one-vote majority in Parliament, is more important than the risk of putting a rival in charge of Israel’s vaunted security forces and of further straining relations with Washington.

Mr. Netanyahu may also believe that a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, creating a Palestinian state alongside Israel, as Washington has long advocated, is effectively dead for now, and that he may get a better defense deal from the next president.

But that is a risky and cynical gamble. The next American president is not likely to abandon support for a two-state solution, and Israel’s position in Washington will not be strengthened by a defense minister at odds with the Israeli military establishment.

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook and Twitter, and sign up for the Opinion Today newsletter.

A version of this article appears in print on  , Section A, Page 20 of the New York edition with the headline: A Baffling, Hard-line Choice in Israel. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT